Sunday, October 13, 2013

Will rising sea levels affect me?


Dear Dr. Rock,

I heard recently that with global warming, many coastal cities will one day be underwater. Is this true? Is San Diego, where I live, one of those cities? Which cities will "go under" first? Is this something that might happen in the next decade or so? Or how long?
Doug Montigale
San Diego

Doug,
I don't want to get mired in the politics of climate change. It is a topic we need to think seriously about. Sea level change due to global warming is real, though perhaps not the most critical effect (that might be weather: drought, crop failure, drinking water...). But let's attend to Doug's question.This is not, strictly speaking, a geology question, since the science of climate change is multidisciplinary. I was just looking at the new National Geographic's article titled "Rising Seas" down at the barber shop. It has a fold out map [web version here] showing sea level if ALL the world's ice melted and sea level consequently rose 216 feet*. No one is saying that climate change is going to cause that. That would be bad, but it has happened in the geologic past, when the earth was much warmer during the Eocene, first instance, and glaciers were very rare or nonexistent on Earth.
Observations show that sea level has been rising since at least 1880. Between 1901 and 2010, global sea levels rose by 19 centimeters (7.6 inches) - an average of about 1.7 millimeters (1/14 inch) per year. But looking at the last few decades, it's clear sea level rise is speeding up. Between 1993 and 2010, sea levels rose by 3.2 mm (1/8 inch) per year - nearly twice the long term average.**
Small potatoes, huh? Yeah, but that is 1 inch every 8 years, one foot in less than 100 years. Still small potatoes? That doesn't account for any increase in the newly measured 1/8 inch rate. Current projections by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) call for sea level rise of about 6 feet globally if carbon emissions are not drastically curtailed.
The view from my deck on a sunny day in Bellingham,
WA, USA. Elevation 133 feet above the bay. Alaska
Ferry terminal in the middle ground. Click to enlarge.
What does that mean? Is San Diego going to "go under" as Doug puts it? Well, no, only those places that are less than 6 feet above sea level, and certainly not in the next decade. The Silver Strand, with the North Island Naval Air Station, is going to be submerged, or at least very precarious. In my town, Bellingham Washington, on the Salish Sea, that means that the Alaska Ferry dock will need to be repositioned, the city's waterfront parks will be submerged, the busy marina on the bay will need to replace pilings and add to the breakwater. The former site of the Georgia Pacific paper mill on the waterfront, currently being redeveloped by the city and port, will need to be designed to have a higher level grade (elevation of sea level) than at present. Bellingham is a small city. Multiply that by every coastal city in America, and you are looking at big bucks. Studies show that New York City has assets of 2+ trillion dollars at risk. Miami is worse: $3 trillion. Hurricane Sandy nearly a year ago was pretty bad. Add 6 feet to that storm surge! Then extend that to the rest of the world. Read the National Geographic article for more data and the human story. Here is a University of Arizona website with detailed maps of some coastal US cities under various sea level increases. Read a pre-Sandy New York Times article (March 13, 2012) on the expected effects of sea level rise in the near future on Americans.

University of Arizona sea level forecast map for SE USA. Click to enlarge
The principal contribution of geologists to climate change theory is showing that the geological record (that  is, rocks) demonstrate that climate change has happened in the past. Evidence for climate change is preserved in a wide range of geological settings, including marine and lake sediments, ice sheets, fossil corals, stalagmites and fossil tree rings. Nearly all the world's geological societies, which represent most professional geologists, have issued statements of concern (at the mildest) or warnings that continued carbon emissions will only increase the threat from global warming.

* That would be the pits. My home, on a hill with a nice view of Bellingham Bay, seems far above the bay at an elevation of 133 feet. Hard to imagine my lot could some day be under 83 feet of water! Even worse, those snooty neighbors a couple blocks up the street would have waterfront property! I can only hope their boat's anchor fouls on my chimney.
 
**The source for my information is an analysis of the 2013 IPCC report posted on the The Carbon Brief Blog. The report is based on observations, so the data is not 'wrong'. If you don't believe in the global warming theory, fine, but you can't refute the observed data. In the immortal words of Daniel Patrick Moynihan (US Senator 1927-2003), "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." 


10 comments:

  1. Good perspectives...new waterfront properties...parts of the country will look like Venice Italy!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well written and soft on the politics. Thank you for your insight. My kids and grand kids can understand this and I appreciate that as it will effect them more than me and they will need to do something besides hide their heads in the sand.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have no doubt the is and has always gone through periods of climate change. I am unclear on how man affected the waxing and waning glacial periods millions of years ago.
    I think the Al Gore crowd is simply trying to find ways to capitalize on natural phenomena, that mankind has little or no control of. furthermore whatever they do in the US will have even less effect if Chine and Russia continue on their current path.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Replies
    1. Congratulations on your carefully crafted, well-reasoned rebuttal.

      Delete
  5. The report is based on observations, so the data is not 'wrong'.

    This statement is true ONLY when the observations are measurements against a known standard. Otherwise they are simply are one's guess as how to interpret the data. This is the greatest reason for the "political" discourse. Past and current measurements were gathered by and from different sources using different methods. (Comparing Apples to Oranges?) Also the rise of 1/14" is an average over 100 years. Is the data linear? Maybe it rose 6" the first 50 years and then only 1/28" the next 50. Or of the measurements went back another 100 years there was a 8" drop. Perhaps plate tectonics plays a roll with continents subsiding while the sea beds are rising? Have ALL variables been accounted for or just the ones that support a theory? If one has an agenda they tend to interpret data in their favor. Politics and money again!!!

    I'm not saying the earth is not warming, but to take data over such a short time (100 years) vs 100,000,000+ years of change gives you a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of being correct. Similar to finding a dead fish on the shore and claiming that all fish are dying.

    Just food for thought.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The salinity of the ocean and arid lakes like Great Salt Lake are always described as being the result of soluble salts released by the weathering of rocks. But I don't get it: sodium is abundant in crustal rocks, typically several percent by weight in to form of sodium feldspars, etc. But chlorine is typically present only as a trace constituent. So where did all the chlorine come from to make vast amounts of sodium chloride in the ocean? This seems like a simple question, but I've never met a geologist who had an answer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Anonymous,
      I'm not a chemist. However, I have become a pretty good researcher of scientific literature. Volcanoes. Blame volcanoes. Here's the deal. Volcanic eruptions carry large amounts of chlorine (principally as HCl) out of the earth's mantle onto the surface or into the atmosphere. One study estimates between 0.4 and 11 terragrams of Cl are erupted per year [= 0.4-to-11 billion tons]. Chlorine is highly soluble, so quickly washes out of eruption clouds or on-shore deposits into the oceans. It tends to stay in the ocean, where it is most stable. The addition of sodium (Na) eroded from rocks on land produces common sea salt, NaCl.
      If you want to read more, try this 1996 research paper published in Pure and Applied Chemistry:
      http://www.wasserplanet.becsoft.de/ozonquellen/chlorinecycle6809x1689.pdf

      Delete
  7. Dr. Rock,

    Will you give us a lead on info regarding the volcanoes just north of Phoenix, Az? There seen to be many and they are so beautifully shaped .

    Thanks from Jenny in Redmond, WA.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jenny,
    Thanks for writing. I'm unaware of any volcanoes near Phoenix. Perhaps you are seeing eroded buttes with a conical shape. I checked several geology maps and USGS data. The rocks are largely volcanic, but very old. If you have photos, please send them as email attachments

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated. Yours may not appear for awhile after you post it. This keeps away the low-life spammers.